By Onthatile Mahlangu
![]() |
| Picture from facebook |
Two recent articles from the City Press and the Sunday Times indicate that Shell, a major player in the oil industry, is considering withdrawing from its operations in South Africa.
According to the Sunday Times, Shell has told Energy
Minister Gwede Mantashe and Trade & Industry Minister Ebrahim Patel of its
plan to leave SA.
Spokesperson of Shell Pam Ntaka said Shell has undertaken a
comprehensive review of the Downstream and Renewables businesses across all
regions and markets in line with Shell’s focus on performance, discipline, and
simplification. As a result of this review, Shell has decided to reshape the
Downstream portfolio and intends to divest our shareholding in Shell Downstream
South Africa (SDSA). Considering SDSA’s illustrious history, this decision was
not taken lightly.
“During the divestment process, we will work to preserve
Shell Downstream South Africa's operating capabilities, maintain the Shell
brand presence, and secure the best possible outcome for our people and
customers in South Africa under new ownership,” Ntaka added.
Shell originally
embarked on a refinery processing deal in 1998 with Tepco, an energy company
owned and established by Thebe Investment Corporation. This was followed by
joint ventures with Tepco in 2001 in aviation and commercial fuels.
The intention of Thebe Investments, the global group, to
sell its 72% share in Shell Downstream South Africa has led to a dispute
regarding the valuation of Thebe's remaining 28% ownership stake in the
company, causing conflict between the involved parties, this is according to the City Press.
Meanwhile, citizens on X blame the government for the
potential departure of the oil industry from South Africa.
Vrystaat Boerwors tweeted that “Black Economic Empowerment (BEE)
partner (ANC code for corruption useless thieves) demanded an impossible
increase in their share," implying frustration with the (BEE) policies and their
impact on business dealings.
The BEE’s goals are to: Redress past inequalities, promote
ownership and wealth creation, and transform the economy.
However, people argue that BEE can be misused for
corruption, with some companies focusing on ticking a BEE ownership box rather
than genuine transformation.
There are debates about how effective BEE policies are in
achieving their goals. Some argue it benefits a small, wealthy elite rather
than the broader Black population.
"What did the BEE ever contribute to Shell's business
activities - or were they there for the free ride?" This question reflects
skepticism about the actual contributions of BEE partners to Shell's
operations, hinting at concerns over the effectiveness and fairness of BEE
partnerships in the business landscape.

No comments:
Post a Comment